I'm working on a new feature. Please analyze the code in this file with the following checks to ensure consistency, maintainability, and adherence to project standards:

Naming conventions: Are all new variables, functions, and class names consistent with existing naming patterns across this repository (e.g., camelCase, snake_case, PascalCase)?

Logic duplication: Are there any repeated blocks or algorithms that already exist elsewhere in the codebase (including known utility functions or modules)?

Structural consistency: Does the code follow architectural patterns used in similar modules (e.g., standardized error handling, consistent import formatting, logging practices)?

Reusability: Are there opportunities to refactor code by using existing utilities, services, or helpers? Highlight specific function names or files.

Readability and maintainability: Are control structures, abstractions, and comments clear and aligned with the team’s coding style? Please suggest simplifications or alternative constructs where appropriate.

Please perform a detailed review of this pull request with attention to consistency, reuse, and design integrity across the codebase:

Naming validation: Do newly introduced variables, functions, and classes conform to existing naming conventions and semantic clarity?

Code reuse: Is there any redundant logic that should be replaced with existing utilities, modules, or shared components?

Import and module structure: Are there inconsistencies in import style or module architecture compared to established conventions?

Opportunity for abstraction: Identify any repeated logic or structures that could be abstracted for future reusability.

Simplification opportunities: Suggest improvements in readability or architectural clarity (e.g., replacing nested conditionals with guard clauses, reducing cognitive complexity).